ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2012 by date

Monday, 31 December 2012

FYI: Tools to evaluate header compression algorithms Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 29 December 2012

CREDENTIAL frame documentation yusuke

Wednesday, 26 December 2012

WebDAV If header field and HTTP conditional precedence Ken Murchison

Wednesday, 19 December 2012

Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Willy Tarreau
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Mark Nottingham
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Willy Tarreau
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Mark Nottingham
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 18 December 2012

Re: new version of Flow Control Principles Willy Tarreau

Friday, 14 December 2012

Re: new version of Flow Control Principles Roberto Peon

Thursday, 13 December 2012

Re: new version of Flow Control Principles Jonathan Ballard
RE: new version of Flow Control Principles Gabriel Montenegro
RE: new version of Flow Control Principles Gabriel Montenegro
Re: new version of Flow Control Principles Jonathan Ballard
Re: new version of Flow Control Principles Eliot Lear
new version of Flow Control Principles Gabriel Montenegro

Wednesday, 12 December 2012

Re: Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Roberto Peon
Re: Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Martin Thomson
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Amos Jeffries
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Willy Tarreau
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Roy T. Fielding
Re: Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Roberto Peon
Re: Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Amos Jeffries
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Willy Tarreau
Re: #409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Amos Jeffries
#409: is parsing OBS-FOLD mandatory? Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

Re: More cookies Martin Thomson
Re: More cookies Patrick McManus
More cookies Martin Thomson
Re: Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Julian Reschke
Re: HTTPBIS WG Interim Meeting, January 30 - February 1, 2013, Tokyo Mark Nottingham
Re: #402: Comparison function for If-Match and If-None-Match Mark Nottingham
Title (and Identifier) for final and in-progress versions of HTTP version 2 Martin Thomson

Friday, 7 December 2012

Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Jonathan Ballard

Thursday, 6 December 2012

Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Jonathan Ballard
Re: [OAUTH-WG] fyi: IETF conflict review results for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol Barry Leiba
Re: From header Darrel Miller
Re: From header Julian Reschke
Re: From header Jonathan Ballard
Re: fyi: IETF conflict review results for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol Daniel Stenberg
fyi: IETF conflict review results for draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol =JeffH
From header Nathan

Wednesday, 5 December 2012

Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Martin Thomson
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Julian Reschke
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr-00.txt Eliot Lear
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Jonathan Ballard
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Adrien W. de Croy

Tuesday, 4 December 2012

Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Barry Leiba
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Martin Thomson
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Martin Thomson
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback James M Snell
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Julian Reschke
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Barry Leiba
draft-snell-http-prefer-17 feedback Julian Reschke
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham

Friday, 30 November 2012

Re: delta-encoding compressor code Roberto Peon
Re: Regarding initial dictionary for HTTP http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-00#ref-UDELCOMPRESSION Martin Thomson
Regarding initial dictionary for HTTP http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-00#ref-UDELCOMPRESSION Frédéric Kayser

Thursday, 29 November 2012

delta-encoding compressor code Roberto Peon

Friday, 30 November 2012

Re: HTTPBIS WG Interim Meeting, January 30 - February 1, 2013, Tokyo Mark Nottingham
First draft of HTTP/2 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 29 November 2012

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
HTTPBIS WG Interim Meeting, January 30 - February 1, 2013, Tokyo IESG Secretary
Re: Lingering Close Zhong Yu
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Re: Lingering Close Zhong Yu
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Re: Lingering Close Jamie Lokier
Re: Lingering Close Jamie Lokier
Re: Lingering Close Zhong Yu
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Re: Lingering Close Zhong Yu
Re: Lingering Close Roberto Peon
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Re: Lingering Close Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Lingering Close Willy Tarreau
Lingering Close Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Amos Jeffries
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Roy T. Fielding
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Zhong Yu
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Amos Jeffries
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Julian Reschke
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Amos Jeffries
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Amos Jeffries
Re: #238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Re: P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Willy Tarreau
P1: Content-Length SHOULD be sent Mark Nottingham
#402: Comparison function for If-Match and If-None-Match Mark Nottingham
Re: #401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Mark Nottingham
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Mark Nottingham
Re: WGLC issue: 'no-transform' Mark Nottingham
Re: Message length and caches Adrien W. de Croy

Monday, 26 November 2012

Re: Message length and caches David Morris
Re: Message length and caches Roberto Peon
Re: Message length and caches Roberto Peon
Re: Message length and caches Roy T. Fielding
Re: Message length and caches Adrien W. de Croy
Re: Message length and caches Amos Jeffries
Re: Message length and caches Roberto Peon
Re: Message length and caches Adrien W. de Croy
Re: Message length and caches Roberto Peon
Message length and caches Willy Tarreau
Re: WGLC issue: 'no-transform' Willy Tarreau
WGLC issue: 'no-transform' Mark Nottingham
WGLC review of p2 -- Editorial Issues Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 21 November 2012

Tuesday, 20 November 2012

Wording in Connection Management Zhong Yu
Re: UTF-8 NFC vs NFD compression, French sample (was: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft) Nico Williams

Monday, 19 November 2012

Re: #401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Mark Nottingham
Re: #401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 18 November 2012

Re: #401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Mark Nottingham
RE: #401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Larry Masinter

Thursday, 15 November 2012

Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Zhong Yu
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest, "5.3 If-Range" Thomas Fossati
Re: UTF-8 NFC vs NFD compression, French sample (was: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft) Roberto Peon
Re: Queries re P6 Adrien W. de Croy
Re: on DNS records Roland Zink
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Amos Jeffries
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Yves Lafon
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Yves Lafon
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Yves Lafon
Re: UTF-8 NFC vs NFD compression, French sample (was: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft) Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest, "5.3 If-Range" Yves Lafon
UTF-8 NFC vs NFD compression, French sample (was: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft) Frédéric Kayser
Re: on DNS records Roland Zink
Re: #403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Julian Reschke
Re: Queries re P6 Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest, "5.3 If-Range" Mark Nottingham
#407: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Mark Nottingham
Re: review of p5-latest Mark Nottingham
#403: cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Eliot Lear
#401 /#402: Our old friends, weak ETags Mark Nottingham
Re: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft Martin J. Dürst
HTTP Integrity Header / Session Continuation mechanism Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: High-resolution timestamp in HTTP response header Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Amos Jeffries
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Amos Jeffries
Re: on DNS records Patrick McManus
Re: on DNS records Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Patrick McManus
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Greg Wilkins
Re: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft Frédéric Kayser
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ludin, Stephen

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

Re: on DNS records Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Mark Nottingham
Re: on DNS records Greg Wilkins
Re: on DNS records James M Snell
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Adrien W. de Croy
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Patrick McManus
Re: on DNS records Adrien W. de Croy
Re: on DNS records Willy Tarreau
Re: on DNS records Adrien W. de Croy
Re: on DNS records Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: on DNS records Eliot Lear
Re: on DNS records Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: on DNS records Martin Thomson
Re: on DNS records Eliot Lear
Re: on DNS records Martin Thomson
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt John Kemp
Re: on DNS records Eliot Lear
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ilya Grigorik
Re: on DNS records Adrien W. de Croy
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Eitan Adler
Re: on DNS records Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: on DNS records Amos Jeffries

Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ludin, Stephen
Re: on DNS records Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: on DNS records Eliot Lear
Re: on DNS records James M Snell
Re: on DNS records Phillip Hallam-Baker
on DNS records Eliot Lear

Monday, 12 November 2012

Draft minutes from Atlanta Mark Nottingham
Re: Queries re P6 Adrien W. de Croy
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Tiffany B. Brown
Re: Queries re P6 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 9 November 2012

Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Eitan Adler
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ilya Grigorik
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt John Kemp
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ilya Grigorik
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Martin Nilsson
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Martin Nilsson
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Ilya Grigorik

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Amos Jeffries
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Amos Jeffries
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Tiffany B. Brown
Re: RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Eitan Adler
RFC: draft-brown-device-stock-ua-00.txt Tiffany B. Brown

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Second HTTPbis Working Group Session in Atlanta today, 9am eastern time Julian Reschke
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Erik Nygren

Monday, 5 November 2012

First HTTPbis Working Group Session in Atlanta today, 1pm eastern time Julian Reschke

Sunday, 4 November 2012

Re: WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Julian Reschke

Saturday, 3 November 2012

Re: WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Dan Winship
Re: WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Julian Reschke
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Re: Metadata about the selected representation in a PUT response Amos Jeffries

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Metadata about the selected representation in a PUT response Julian Reschke
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Zhong Yu
Re: WGLC method-registrations comment Martin Nilsson
Re: WGLC method-registrations comment Julian Reschke
WGLC method-registrations comment Martin Nilsson
Re: WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Dan Winship
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Julian Reschke
Queries re P6 Adrien W. de Croy

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Re: WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Amos Jeffries
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Amos Jeffries
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Zhong Yu
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Martin Thomson
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Julian Reschke
Re: WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Zhong Yu
WGLC review of p2-semantics (editorial stuff) Dan Winship
WGLC review of p1-messaging (editorial stuff) Dan Winship
Re: WGLC - Editorial feedback /questions on p1 Amos Jeffries
WGLC - Editorial feedback /questions on p1 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 29 October 2012

Re: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Re: Initiation rites (Re: run HTTP over UDP(HTTPP)) tom
Re: Initiation rites (Re: run HTTP over UDP(HTTPP)) tom
Re: Initiation rites (Re: run HTTP over UDP(HTTPP)) Poul-Henning Kamp
Initiation rites (Re: run HTTP over UDP(HTTPP)) Carsten Bormann
run HTTP over UDP(HTTPP) tom

Saturday, 27 October 2012

Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Salvatore Loreto

Friday, 26 October 2012

Prefer pre-publish errata... James M Snell
Re: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt Barry Leiba
Re: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt Barry Leiba
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt Barry Leiba
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt Julian Reschke
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt Julian Reschke
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Fall, Kevin
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Albert Lunde
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Amos Jeffries
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Adrien W. de Croy
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries

Thursday, 25 October 2012

Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Adrien W. de Croy
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Adrien W. de Croy
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Adrien W. de Croy
RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results Roberto Peon
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Zhong Yu
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Patrick McManus
Re: draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Fall, Kevin
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Yoav Nir
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Patrick McManus
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Patrick McManus
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Martin Nilsson
Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Nils Goroll
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Takeshi Yoshino
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Salvatore Loreto
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Amos Jeffries
RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results RUELLAN Herve
RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results RUELLAN Herve
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
RE: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Gabriel Montenegro
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Salvatore Loreto
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
draft-kfall-httpbis-server-ranges [was: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta] Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Adrien W. de Croy
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Zhong Yu
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Adrien W. de Croy
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results James M Snell
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Eliot Lear
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Patrick McManus
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest, "5.3 If-Range" Thomas Fossati
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Roberto Peon
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Zhong Yu
Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-snell-http-prefer-16.txt James M Snell
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Patrick McManus
Re: #388: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21, "3.2 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" Julian Reschke
Re: #388: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Mark Nottingham
Re: #388: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Nils Goroll
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Amos Jeffries
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Eliot Lear
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries
Re: X-Content-Warning response for better world Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
X-Content-Warning response for better world Talisman Dima
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation James M Snell
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Eliot Lear
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Takeshi Yoshino
Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation James M Snell
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation James M Snell
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation David Kendal
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation James M Snell
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Roberto Peon
#388: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Amos Jeffries
testing HTTP, one idea Larry Masinter
RE: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results Roberto Peon
Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Nils Goroll
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Patrick McManus
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Eliot Lear
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation James M Snell
RE: HTTP Header Compaction Results RUELLAN Herve
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Roberto Peon
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Barry Leiba
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Barry Leiba
Re: #238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Mark Nottingham
Re: #238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Martin Nilsson
Re: #238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
Re: #238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Mark Nottingham
#238, was: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Julian Reschke
Re: User interface requirements for redirecting to unsafe methods Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Preliminary agenda for Atlanta Fall, Kevin
Re: Updated Prefer Header Draft James M Snell
Preliminary agenda for Atlanta Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: #385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation 陈智昌
Re: Updated Prefer Header Draft Mark Nottingham
#385: HTTP2 Upgrade / Negotiation Mark Nottingham
Re: Updated Prefer Header Draft Adrien W. de Croy

Monday, 22 October 2012

Working Group Last Call on Registration Documents Mark Nottingham
Re: WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Mark Nottingham
Second Working Group Last Call for HTTP/1.1 p4 to p7 Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP Header Compaction Results Vinayak Hegde
HTTP Header Compaction Results RUELLAN Herve
review of p5-latest Thomas Fossati
Re: 204/205 Text nit Mark Nottingham
Re: 204/205 Text nit Zhong Yu

Sunday, 21 October 2012

204/205 Text nit Nathan
Re: What is the document base URI of a POSTed document? James M Snell
Re: What is the document base URI of a POSTed document? Mark Baker

Thursday, 18 October 2012

WGLC issue: (minor?) scope of client/server attributes (specifically: downgrades) in p1 Nils Goroll
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Willy Tarreau
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Willy Tarreau
Input for conflict review of draft-secure-cookie-session-protocol Barry Leiba

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Amos Jeffries
Re: What is the document base URI of a POSTed document? James M Snell
What is the document base URI of a POSTed document? Steve Battle
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Ken Murchison
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Amos Jeffries
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Simon Pieters
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Mark Nottingham
Require UAs and intermediary caches to assume Vary: User-Agent Simon Pieters
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Roy T. Fielding
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Roy T. Fielding
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 James M Snell
Re: Permission to translate your page at http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html Peter Saint-Andre

Monday, 15 October 2012

Re: Permission to translate your page at http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html Mark Nottingham
Re: Permission to translate your page at http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html Julian Reschke
Permission to translate your page at http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html Jovana Milutinovich

Sunday, 14 October 2012

Working Group Last Call for HTTP/1.1 p1 and p2 Mark Nottingham
using http2.0 in online office documents interoperability,need WebSocket protocol Zhun Guo
cacheability of Authentication and no-cache Amos Jeffries

Saturday, 13 October 2012

Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 Jan Algermissen
Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 Mark Nottingham
Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 James M Snell
Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 Mark Nottingham
Re: [apps-discuss] Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 James M Snell
Re: Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Mark Nottingham
Re-review of draft-snell-http-prefer-15 Barry Leiba
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-10.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Friday, 12 October 2012

Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Willy Tarreau
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Willy Tarreau
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: Link and Unlink Mark Nottingham
Re: Link and Unlink James M Snell
issues addressed in the -21 drafts Mark Nottingham
Re: Link and Unlink Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Martin Thomson
Updated Prefer Header Draft James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Ken Murchison
Re: Link and Unlink Julian Reschke
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Willy Tarreau
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Willy Tarreau

Thursday, 11 October 2012

Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding James M Snell
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Roberto Peon
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding Martin Nilsson
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding James M Snell
Re: SPDY and the HTTP Binding 陈智昌
SPDY and the HTTP Binding James M Snell

Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Re: 304 and Age Amos Jeffries
Compact Header Encoding Yoav Nir
Re: Link and Unlink Amos Jeffries
Re: 304 and Age Eric J. Bowman
Re: Link and Unlink James M Snell
Re: 304 and Age Thomas Fossati
Re: Link and Unlink James M Snell
RE: Link and Unlink Manger, James H
Re: Link and Unlink James M Snell
Re: Link and Unlink Amos Jeffries
Re: 304 and Age Amos Jeffries

Monday, 8 October 2012

Link and Unlink James M Snell
304 and Age Thomas Fossati

Saturday, 6 October 2012

Fwd: httpbis - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 85 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 5 October 2012

Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard James M Snell
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Martin Thomson
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard James M Snell
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Martin Thomson
Re: Range Specifier Registry - 404 Barry Leiba
Range Specifier Registry - 404 Karl Dubost
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard James M Snell
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Martin Thomson
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Zhong Yu
Re: p1-messaging: request line trailing SP Zhong Yu
Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-http-prefer-14.txt> (Prefer Header for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
p1-messaging: request line trailing SP Amos Jeffries

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Re: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft James M Snell
Re: httpbis -21 drafts Julian Reschke
Re: httpbis -21 drafts Barry Leiba
httpbis -21 drafts Julian Reschke
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Re: HTTP 1.1 --> 2.0 Upgrade Salvatore Loreto
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Roy T. Fielding
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Zhong Yu
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Zhong Yu
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Roy T. Fielding
Re: Ambiguity in the Range header Ashok Kumar
Re: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft Ashok Kumar
Ambiguity in the Range header Zhong Yu
RE: Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft Jeroen de Borst

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: Headers and Compression [was: Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0] James M Snell
Re: Headers and Compression [was: Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0] Roberto Peon
Headers and Compression [was: Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0] James M Snell
Updated Binary Optimized Header Encoding Draft James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Ken Murchison
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Mark Nottingham
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer Ken Murchison
Re: draft-snell-http-prefer James M Snell
draft-snell-http-prefer Ken Murchison
Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0 Roberto Peon
Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0 Roberto Peon
Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0 Eliot Lear
Re: Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0 Amos Jeffries

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Getting (Officially) Started on HTTP/2.0 Mark Nottingham
WG Action: Rechartered Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis) The IESG
HTTPAuth BoF in Atlanta Yoav Nir

Monday, 1 October 2012

Re: HTTP 1.1 --> 2.0 Upgrade Willy Tarreau
Re: HTTP 1.1 --> 2.0 Upgrade Greg Wilkins

Last message date: Monday, 31 December 2012 02:23:00 UTC