- From: Adrian Custer <avc.httpbis@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:02:31 -0400
- To: HTTPbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hey all,
Section 3.2.2 of version 20 of the current draft, in the second
paragraph, states:
"The field value does not include any leading or
trailing white space: ..."
so should the ABNF not be something like
field-value = (VCHAR / obs-text) [ *(field-content / obs-fold)
(VCHAR / obs-text) ]
(ignoring the line break which may alter the semantic meaning)?
The current ABNF allows both leading and trailing whitespace, indeed
would allow the whole value to be a space.
Since this definition would force the field-value to be non-empty, this
approach would require allowing the field-value to be optional in the
<header-field> element rather than requiring a, possibly empty,
field-value. That approach makes more logical sense to me but might have
repercussions of which I am unaware.
cheers,
Adrian
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2012 15:02:59 UTC