- From: Adrian Custer <avc.httpbis@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:02:31 -0400
- To: HTTPbis <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hey all, Section 3.2.2 of version 20 of the current draft, in the second paragraph, states: "The field value does not include any leading or trailing white space: ..." so should the ABNF not be something like field-value = (VCHAR / obs-text) [ *(field-content / obs-fold) (VCHAR / obs-text) ] (ignoring the line break which may alter the semantic meaning)? The current ABNF allows both leading and trailing whitespace, indeed would allow the whole value to be a space. Since this definition would force the field-value to be non-empty, this approach would require allowing the field-value to be optional in the <header-field> element rather than requiring a, possibly empty, field-value. That approach makes more logical sense to me but might have repercussions of which I am unaware. cheers, Adrian
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2012 15:02:59 UTC