- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:30:35 +0000
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
- cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <2A8028EE-0EEC-4E42-89C4-347C33F60B90@checkpoint.com>, Yoav Nir writ es: >A requirement for downgrade creates too many restrictions, even if we throw > SPDY away. The beginning of a 2.0 connection would have to look enough like >1.x so as to fool existing servers. Yes, and ? Sending: HEAD / HTTP/1.1 Upgrade: HTTP/2.0 as a preamble on a connection is not very expensive. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 21:31:00 UTC