- From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:08 -0700
- To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > Reasonable? Yes. Best course of action? I don't know. I know I'm > beginning to sound like a broken record, but I don't know if SRV is the > right record for the job. For one thing, if you use another record, you > can use that same optimistic approach for an explicit port in the URI. > Of course, then there is the added implementation headache of a new > record. We've gotten around that elseewhere with TXT records, but I > don't recommend it here. > Do you mean to suggest something like http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-faltstrom-uri-06.txt ? regards, Ted
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 19:00:35 UTC