- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:28:44 +0000
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It is not just a question of tooling, it is a matter of processing on devices that either sit as part of the message path (proxies) or have limited ability either as user agent or ultimate destination. Henrik -----Original Message----- From: David Morris [mailto:dwm@xpasc.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:19 AM To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group Subject: RE: In Defense of Header Compresson On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Patrick McManus wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 11:36 +0000, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > > it's primarily the *mechanism* I am interested in. In particular, I > > am interested in its ability for easy inspection > > I'm also totally open to token/table mechanisms that give good results! I have probably spent years of my professional life analyzing data on the wire so I sympathise with the desire to inspect data easily, but I don't accept this as a constraint on the solution, only a tiebreaker. There are enough ways for tools to solve the problem and infact I see a lot of value in having motivation for the creation of more tools to support data inspection.
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 20:29:52 UTC