- From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:00:02 -0400
- To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 12:24 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > If we take architecture seriously, the primary signaling mechanism for > HTTP/2.0 should be some form of statement in a DNS record to tell the > client 'I do HTTP 2.0'. We might also have some sort of upgrade > mechanism for use when the DNS records are blocked but that should be > a fallback. This is my current thinking as well though I'm not tied to it.. srv in the base case (with the possibility of dnssec) and something like upgrade/alternate-protocol over HTTP/1 as a slower fallback.
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 13:00:34 UTC