Re: Semantics of HTTPS

Ah then, .os is available for discussion here. That makes sense with
CONNECT URL.

On Monday, August 6, 2012, Stephen Farrell wrote:

>
>
> On 08/07/2012 01:45 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > Today those rights are just words on a piece of paper describing some
> > fantasy land that does not exist. Recalls marks assumption that he
> > *knew* CONNECT provided end-to-end security. Mark you live in .au still?
> > then your CONNECT is being decrypted. .cn, .sa, .in. .us, rq? same.
>
> I think evidence of that would be useful.
>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>
>