- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:53:24 +1200
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 07.08.2012 08:32, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p1-messaging.html#https.uri> > is slated to define the semantics of HTTPS urls. > > We currently talk about HTTPS' impact on caches and identity there, > but we don't mention one other major effect on HTTP -- the use of > CONNECT to proxies. > > I think we need to define HTTPS as having a semantic of *end-to-end* > use of SSL/TLS, and therefore CONNECT to proxies. > > Make sense? CONNECT is not end-to-end either and the spec text may have confused some people when designing the traffic-light and padlock UI mechanisms. It's just a hop compaction over several stages. W-X-Y-Z may be CONNECT at W-X, and HTTPS W-Y, with no indication of what Y-Z is being used. Creating a HTTPS trusted connection from location W to trusted proxy Y. Trusted by who is the debatable detail. AYJ
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 23:53:48 UTC