- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:56:58 +0000
- To: Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAJ3HoZ05gRkZz_i-=WieFuTF-_hhK5L9oi5FRh27uQ-ywg+4OQ@mail.gmail.com> , Robert Collins writes: >On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> But is 1.1 vs. 2.0 proxy really going to make that much of a difference ? > >Yes, absolutely. > >The key bits are: > - Fix HoL blocking > - Only require one TCP connection So how does that work for protected content ? Is this assuming per-message protection (at least when you talk to a proxy) or does these advantages only extend to unprotected content ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 08:57:26 UTC