- From: Jonathan Ballard <dzonatas@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:41:20 -0700
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 01:41:48 UTC
Section 1.4 p7: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00.txt That would be, after 89 bytes and SPDY, 150 bytes and 150 bits, 28 bytes and 28 bits, 102 bytes minus 102 bits. One SPDY version uses UTF8, another uses int32, and the one with mobility uses only 16bit words (network friendly). On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, James M Snell wrote: > I have submitted an I-D describing the alternative header encoding for > SPDY that I discussed previously. Should be pretty self-explanatory and > there are plenty of examples given throughout. I know it still has yet to > be decided whether SPDY will be the starting point for the HTTP/2.0 effort, > but I wanted to make this available for discussion. > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00.txt > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-httpbis-bohe-00 > > - James > >
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 01:41:48 UTC