- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:52:34 -0700
- To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
- Cc: grahame@healthintersections.com.au, James French <jfrench@denirostaff.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 25 July 2012 18:00, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote: > A trusted intermediary can do anything it likes and the recipient will > accept the data (provided that the trusted intermediary > re-authenticates it) Well, there is trust and then there is trust. I might trust an intermediary to look at my data to determine if it contains bad stuff, but I might not trust it to modify it. One problem with the current system is that you don't get to choose.
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 15:53:02 UTC