- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:38:02 +0000
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In message <CAP+FsNfvUxmWdR2304QXxQMDwVRC5SVimJFSvStjd6KpGxQaOQ@mail.gmail.com> , Roberto Peon writes: [lack of dictionary support for user-agent] >A combination of future proofing and neutrality, as you've guessed. Yeah, I can understand that. Still sucks though. The WURFL database contains what ? 17.000 entires ? and that's just mobile devices. There must be a smarter way than "User-Agent:"... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 13:38:32 UTC