W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: HTTP/2 Expression of luke-warm interest: Varnish

From: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:30:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABaLYCuk4o-mTJ+UsfBfqnbo-xVZysjAjrS8JMW8rnV_WohVxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <20120716204650.GI27010@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
> >I also remember that in private with a few of us you proposed a draft
> >that you never published. There were very valid concerns here. Why do
> >you not share it so that good ideas can be picked from it ?
> The main reason that it never made it to ID, is that there quite
> clearly is no room in the timeplan for the kind of fundamental
> contemplation I wanted to inspire, so it seemed a waste of both
> my own and everybody elses time.
> There's nothing secret about it, and I don't think there is anything
> in it which havn't already been mentioned in emails too:
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/draft-kamp-httpbis-http-20-architecture-01.txt

This is not a spec - you can't implement anything from this.

It's just a long winded, I-D resembling rant against SPDY.

As usual from this author, it does not cite data, evidence or
implementation experience.



> Please disregard any strangeness in the boilerplate, I may not
> thrown all the right spells at xml2rfc, and also note that I have
> subsequently changed my mind on certain subjects, most notably
> Cookies which should simply be exterminated from HTTP/2.0, and
> replaced with a stable session/identity concept which does not make
> it possible or necessary for servers to store data on the clients.
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 03:30:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:02 UTC