Re: #375: Most Conservative (caching and date parsing)

In message <>
, Yutaka OIWA writes:

>+1 on default to ignore.  That's one step further beyond my proposal and
>it makes sense.
>But I am not sure, are there any HTTP date-related headers for which
>ignoring is more dangerous than guessing?

I would hope so, that would increase the chance of people noticing
and fixing the bugs.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 15:18:41 UTC