- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:18:14 +0000
- To: Yutaka OIWA <y.oiwa@aist.go.jp>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAMeZVwuXo8L6yOKzbVWT9bXNO02oEpv4Hwu6pqFht4Ax52hXXw@mail.gmail.com> , Yutaka OIWA writes: >+1 on default to ignore. That's one step further beyond my proposal and >it makes sense. >But I am not sure, are there any HTTP date-related headers for which >ignoring is more dangerous than guessing? I would hope so, that would increase the chance of people noticing and fixing the bugs. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 15:18:41 UTC