- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:27:56 +0000
- To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Doug Beaver <doug@fb.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAMm+LwjYUjpELfi=t3UAOXBYUWWuFD08df58rPvg3Wx=fBrNzQ@mail.gmail.com> , Phillip Hallam-Baker writes: >I can't see a value to mandating use of TLS in HTTP/2.0. Lets move it back one step further: There is negative value in mandating crypto in HTTP/2.0 because it will make HTTP/2.0 unattractive to the people who refer to themselves as "in the multimedia business". These people deliver about 1/3-1/2 half of all HTTP traffic on the Internet in a fetching range of skin-tones. Please don't try to push political agendas, like mandatory encryption, with technical means. It doesn't work. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 12:28:20 UTC