- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:59:13 +1200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 15/07/2012 7:07 p.m., Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <50026533.9060502@treenet.co.nz>, Amos Jeffries writes: > >> Hopefully the result will be a BIG change towards simplicity. But only >> time will tell about that. > I don't see any signs of that anywhere, care to elaborate what you > base your hope on ? > "Hope is hope. If we had reasons, it'd be called surety" - Anonymous. We have the opportunity for reducing the HTTPbis specs into one spec which describes the framing for HTTP/2 and flow controls. Leaving the rest of the protocol features out as separate optional extensions. There is hope, slim maybe, but hope. AYJ
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2012 08:59:44 UTC