- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:42:10 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <20120714052933.GL16256@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >If you're talking about Roberto's mail, I read quite the opposite in >fact. It was said that Google was open to have anything provided that >the concepts raised in SPDY were preserved. Well, which way is it Roberto ? Care to clarify ? >I have talked long hours with the SPDY team at IETF83. [...] They >clearly said they were open to changes. What else do you want ? I want a sensible and ethical engineering process, one that doesn't dive headlong into serialization of HTTP headers until we have established what problems HTTP/2.0 should solve. Sneaking things like server-push through the backdoor is simply not acceptable, without structured decision to give up on HTTP's strict request-response model. It may be that we want to loose the strict R-R model, it may be that we do not. But making the HTTP/2.0 process a matter of "who already has a ready ID" is not the way to decide a question like that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 06:42:34 UTC