- From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:10:00 -0500
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Maybe we should rename the bloody thing... One more misconception seems to be that "API" means you must have a library and use _it_. But GSS is an *abstract* API and there's no need to either have a complete implementation, nor to have C or any other bindings of the abstract API. Microsoft, for example, has been using SSPI instead of GSS for ages, yet interops on the wire. Samba has implemented GSS without using the API at all. Those are existence proofs... We created SASL/GS2 (which is what REST-GSS actually uses) in large part to simplify things. I should have called it REST-SASL.. Maybe I still can! Nico --
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 22:10:24 UTC