Re: #364 Capturing more information in the method registry from Julian Reschke on 2012-07-06 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 05:24:45 +0200
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4FF65A7D.7000500@gmx.de>

On 2012-07-06 04:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 6/07/2012 6:02 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-07-05 19:22, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> ...and here are the values for the other methods, with some inline
>> comments:
>
> Your interpretation of RFC 4918 methods matches my list. Still going
> through the others.

RFC 4918 actually states safeness/idempotency.

The harder ones are earlier specs :-)

Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 03:25:14 UTC