Re: #364 Capturing more information in the method registry

On 2012-07-05 08:41, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-07-05 02:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> So, I'm hearing a lot of agreement on adding idempotency to the registry.
>> Anyone object to that as closing this issue?
>> Cheers,
> Works for me. Hopefully it won't be too much work to figure out all
> values for existing methods :-)
> Best regards, Julian

Also, would it make sense to mention somewhere that for resource that 
support strong ETags, any request can be made idempotent by adding an 
"If-Match" header with that ETag?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 13:41:25 UTC