- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:40:51 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-07-05 08:41, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-07-05 02:48, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> So, I'm hearing a lot of agreement on adding idempotency to the registry. >> >> Anyone object to that as closing this issue? >> >> Cheers, > > Works for me. Hopefully it won't be too much work to figure out all > values for existing methods :-) > > Best regards, Julian Also, would it make sense to mention somewhere that for resource that support strong ETags, any request can be made idempotent by adding an "If-Match" header with that ETag? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 13:41:25 UTC