- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 22:24:16 -0400
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPW_8m7rVzQ1zkY+KD3i2iEbeRJ7P-cUYwE46nCpnBS+1=+Tag@mail.gmail.com>
+1 on listing idempotent. this is _critical_ in assessing the use/impact of a method. I'm not clear why it's left off the listing. mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 03.07.2012 00:29, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis >> Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) >> Method >> Registrations >> Author(s) : Julian F. Reschke >> Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-method-** >> registrations-08.txt >> Pages : 6 >> Date : 2012-07-02 >> >> Abstract: >> This document registers those Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) >> methods which have been defined in standards-track RFCs before the >> IANA HTTP Method Registry was established. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-** >> registrations<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations> >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-ietf-httpbis-method-**registrations-08<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08> >> >> A diff from previous version is available at: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?**url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-** >> method-registrations-08<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-08> >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-**drafts/<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> >> > > Thank you for that. > > I just wish the registry recorded the other properties we request as > considerations for new headers. eg. idempotent=yes/no. Not just safe=yes/no. > > AYJ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 02:24:43 UTC