- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:36:45 +0000
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Kevin Cathcart" <kevincathcart@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> >In message <em8582f3b4-bdc2-4f0b-ad2f-0dccfd9729fb@boist>, "Adrien W. de Croy" >writes: > > >>>> >>>>We should be able to learn from experience here... ASN.1 encoding >>>>rules... have any become dominant? >>>> >>> >>> >>>Have any ever broken the 1Gbit/s barrier ? >>> >>> >> >>no idea. What I meant was dominant amongst themselves... e.g. one >>preferred encoding (like DER) rather than the other 6 or 7. >> > > >I don't care how dominant, if it doesn't do at least 40Gbit/sec with >less than 10% of a contemporary machine, it's not relevant. > that's not the point. I'm trying to see if there is any knowledge out there about whether there is any benefit to having multiple encodings or not, whether experience has shown that it was a pointless exercise or not. So throughput is meaningless. > > >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > >
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2012 23:37:04 UTC