- From: Adrien W. de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:30:43 +0000
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Kevin Cathcart" <kevincathcart@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>;"Kevin Cathcart" <kevincathcart@gmail.com>;"ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Sent: 31/03/2012 11:56:29 p.m. Subject: Re: Make HTTP 2.0 message/transport format agnostic >In message <em0bd24bf1-0df5-4eb2-aba4-7ca1e81c7ade@boist>, "Adrien W. de Croy" >writes: > > >> >>We should be able to learn from experience here... ASN.1 encoding >>rules... have any become dominant? >> > > >Have any ever broken the 1Gbit/s barrier ? > no idea. What I meant was dominant amongst themselves... e.g. one preferred encoding (like DER) rather than the other 6 or 7. Adrien > > > >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > >
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2012 11:31:15 UTC