- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:24:49 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <CABaLYCtg4iH=KYqJ+fpO2H0vNdJWppTW2kNx34m6Eu58VxtvFA@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >Google, Twitter, Amazon and others have *already* deployed SPDY, I think we can fairly and squarely say that those three named examples are more than 5 sigma out from the average web-server. >These deployments are clear evidence that >there is demand. I don't doubt there is _demand_, but that demand is not a mandate nor does it justify an edict. I fully think SPDY should be standardized, but I don't think it should be named HTTP/2.0. >How much global legislation about liability for accidentally leaked >information do you need before you'll believe that we have a responsibility >here? We have a responsibility to deliver good tools, we have no mandate to enforce (our pet) policy. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 10:25:15 UTC