- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:03:44 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203060107290.6189@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>, Ian Hick son writes: >On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, David Morris wrote: >A typical use case would be some parents taking a video of their daughter, >and uploading it to YouTube marked as a private video (knowledge of the >URL is what is required to access it). The grandparents would then be >given the URL to the video, so they can see it. First of: This is so ridiculous that you almost made me do a spittake. You expect baby-parents to know about AES keys in hex ? Gimme a break... Second, Youtube don't accept contents that doesn't conform to one of their approved video formats and if the video has too much entropy (attempted steganography) they will also reject it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 09:04:18 UTC