- From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:05:19 -0800
- To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
- Cc: mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
At 09:50 01-03-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >Stephen and I just had a chat about this matter. He and I came up with a >proposed paragraph to add after that list of bullet points: > > In the initial phase of work on HTTP/2.0, new proposals > for authentication schemes can be made. The WG will > select zero or more of those with a goal of choosing > at least one scheme that is better than those available > for HTTP/1.x. Non-selected schemes might be discussed > with the IETF Security Area for further work there. If the WG selects zero, how can it meet the goal of choosing at least one scheme? Regards, -sm
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 18:07:50 UTC