- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:53:34 +0000
- To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <1330559425.24673.149.camel@home.hno.se>, Henrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nord str=F6m?= writes: >ons 2012-02-29 klockan 15:16 -0800 skrev Mike Belshe: > >> The problem with upgrade is that it costs a round trip of latency. > >Only if you are pipelining and then only on the second request, and >pipelining on the first request is generally a bad idea anyway. So no. There is of course an incredible evil way to indicate what protocol you want, without expending a RTT: Have the server send a TCP option in the SYN+ACK packet that tells you what it can do on this TCP connection. /me <- ducks -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:53:58 UTC