- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:59:13 +0000
- To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
- Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, iesg@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
On 24 feb 2012, at 16:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be > deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of > practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed. What makes us > think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more > fertile ground? Because people disagree on whether it is actually hard to get new RRTYPEs deployed. I for example do completely disagree on it being hard. Sure, your user interface in the gui of your favorite $EDITOR might not support the new RRTYPE, but should that constrain deployment of good standards? Patrik
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 09:37:53 UTC