Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> How many times do we have to do this before we declare insanity?
> I don't care how much risk it adds to the HTTP charter.  They are
> all just meaningless deadlines anyway.  If we want HTTP to have
> something other than Basic (1993) and Digest (1995) authentication,
> then it had better be part of *this* charter so that the proposals
> can address them.

Well, Digest already isn't used by anyone :)

Seriously, someone needs to propose some charter language or this
discussion is a no-op.  -Tim

Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 01:19:24 UTC