- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:26:17 +0100
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-02-20 23:07, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 2012-02-20 18:33, Yves Lafon wrote: >>> Based on the feedback received, here is the changeset: >>> >>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1542> >> >> I think we need an addition to the "Changes from RFC 2616" section... > > I think not, for example, saying that a server may coalesce ranges is > implied in 2616, see > << > A response to a request for > multiple ranges, whose result is a single range, MAY be sent as a > multipart/byteranges media type with one part. >>> > so it is mostly clarifications, no real changes. Ack. So is the outcome of #311 that we actually did not make any normative changes? In which case it would be good to close the bug with a short summary of what we changed, and what we did not. (In the issue tracker, not in the spec...) Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 22:26:55 UTC