- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:16:58 +0000
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 16/02/2012 08:11, Adrien de Croy wrote: > > ok thanks > > nice to know I'm not alone I will forward your messages to the newly hired RFC Series Editor, who is the right person to talk to about this kind of stuff. > > Regards > > Adrien > > > On 16/02/2012 8:57 p.m., Carsten Bormann wrote: >> TL;DR answer: no. >> >> Long answer: There is a raging debate about this about once a year, >> often on the main IETF mailing list, making that unusable for about >> two weeks in a row. >> >> Each time, the result is to stick with the RFC format. >> >>> Most other standards bodies seem to have adopted a rich text format. >> Yes. We are different. >> (In many ways, not just this one, but definitely in this one.) >> >> Most definitely don't debate it here. >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:17:51 UTC