- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:01:25 +0100
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Amos, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:33:57PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Willy, the rest of the thread is about *request* not response. No, look at the subject :-) The initial text covered only requests and Mark asked if we should cover responses too. > Squid has > not accepted response whitespace prefixes in a very long time and bug > reports about that are very rare. Excellent ! In my opinion, Squid certainly qualifies as a reference for something widely used. So if you don't have the issue, I think it means the issue does not really exist, so we don't need to skip any CRLF before a response. > Squid does skip whitespace at the beginning of the request and in my > recent experience it seems to be an active problem with scripts and > certain poular PDF readers. Same here. I've recently received a trace of a request emitted by a browser announcing webkit in its UA, I believe it was Safari, where a POST request was sent, then a few tens of milliseconds later, a CRLF was sent in a lone packet while it was not part of the message-body. So I can confirm this is observed from time to time. I'll see if I can find the capture so that we get the exact UA, maybe it was old and has been fixed since. Regards, Willy
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 07:02:18 UTC