- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:18:00 +0000
- To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
- cc: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CA+9kkMDSfPhwc37Ohy_=dO7+rkPBT9bYGYQRNJ=u7uLuYb4jyA@mail.gmail.com> , Ted Hardie writes: >On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >"reliable transport" is a term of art for what you describe above; Yes, but people seem to leave the "transport" bit off and just say "TCP is reliable" which leads to sloppy thinking and invalid conclusions. >Would you propose different method names for this mode, [...] No, that would be missing the point about separating transport from interpretation. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 20:18:24 UTC