- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:58:07 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Anne van Kesteren wrote: >Other than XML, is there a precedent for using "encoding"? Most places use >"charset" I think (HTTP, CSS, HTML). DOM Level 3 Core uses xmlEncoding and inputEncoding, XSLT uses output- encoding, .NET uses System.Text.Encoding.*, Google search uses "ie" and "oe" parameters indicating "encoding", ... It seems unlikely you could make a sensible argument about usage (outside the context of HTTP headers, which includes "HTML") to choose one over the other here. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 03:58:36 UTC