- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:39:28 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Julian Reschke wrote: >On 2012-01-30 12:17, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> Don't repeat so much of / so literally the Abstract in the Introduction, >> it's confusing to read the duplicate. > >I like it that way :-) I can understand it's annoying to phrase them differently, and while Agent Smith might not be around the next corner, but "What, I just read that" is very distracting nevertheless. >Or we could revise RFC 2617's definition of "Basic" and move it into a >separate document. Technically that would be the cleanest approach, but >I fear that doing so would summon those who insist on a complete fix for >all HTTP security issues. Looking at the recent xml-dev thread on Basic, this seems indeed likely. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 01:39:35 UTC