- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:53:08 +0800
- To: "'Poul-Henning Kamp'" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> >See above. It would be only about transport we wouldn't have things > like > >DELETE, PATCH, nor status codes like 307. > > Those are all things being transported, just like GET, PUT and 200 > are and they are no different from a transport point of view, should > not be treated any different from a transport point of view, and > their interpretation and semantics should be standardized separately > from the transport, just like GET, PUT and 200. Sorry to ask a (probably stupid) question in this context. Isn't HTTP supposed to be an application protocol? Wasn't one main problems with SOAP that it abused HTTP as a transport protocol? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:53:47 UTC