- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:55 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <4F23B177.4020005@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >On 2012-01-28 01:44, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> ... >>> but the fact that HTTPbis made >>> RFC2616s page-count double is a major fiasco in my eyes, and I do >>> not really consider the result an improvement over RFC2616 in any >>> significant way. >I just checked, and not counting change logs, collected ABNFs etc, we >went from ~180 to ~250. "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- Antoine de Saint-Exupery -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 08:42:18 UTC