- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:13:32 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <B2DF14CC-C45A-45A7-893D-318D2C70AFA6@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >I'm absolutely with you in spirit. However, an arbitrary number like >"29" doesn't help; the WG can bias towards simplicity when selecting a >proposal. "Simplicity" doesn't dot it, "29" is a nice concrete number for people to have in mind every time they dream up a new fantastic "must have" feature. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 08:14:03 UTC