- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:40:56 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <EC463243-A3B0-4E35-BE92-95B35F3DE067@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >> Re HTTP/next: it would be good to collect a list of things we think we = >should make progress on; not surprisingly, I'd nominate I18N for header = >field values. > >So, that's an interesting question. I18N in transport headers: Forget it, it would kill performance if done right, and do nobody any good if not. I18N in content headers: Sure, be my guest. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:41:27 UTC