- From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:02 +0100
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
tis 2012-01-24 klockan 09:48 +0100 skrev Willy Tarreau: > Maybe HTTP/2.0 could be designed to take advantage of SCTP. Heck, even HTTP/1.1 as-is can take advantage of SCTP, and with very little transport change/mapping it can utilize it very well for framing as well getting rid of many transport & framing issues of HTTP/1.1. > HTTP/1.1 has a number of issues that make the current spec very > heavy and implementations complex (eg: remember you can't fold > set-cookie, the issues with multiple content-length, etc...). > Taking the opportunity of a new version to clear a few of these > old issues would be nice. But SPDY do not.. well sure it addresses the folding issue (there is no folding in SPDY), but multiple content-length is still an issue. Less so than in HTTP/1.1 as it's not transport related any more, but still. Regards Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:06:20 UTC