- From: Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:36:41 +0100
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Looking at the above, the only activity I credibly see us perform > is to beatify SPDY. CoAP (without the limitation on the number of encoded Options) and carried over SCTP, would be a good fit for a number of points proposed in the charter -- i.e. I don't feel like SPDY is the only available candidate.
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 08:38:56 UTC