- From: Ray Polk <raypolk@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:59:10 -0700
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABqtACa2w0LtnfaAtiFNxbSsDVAwkEzARmMw3C0iq-635ErTuA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I had a question about the evolution of media types. Early media types constrained themselves strictly to describing the format (syntax) of the representation (image/png, application/xml). As time wore on, though, media types sprang up that contained both syntactic & semantic type information (see the application/vnd.openxmlformats-*+xml series for an example). Negative ramifications seem obvious (add json, yaml => m*n types, parsing, querying, ...); in fact, in other contexts (DB & object fields), placing two values into a single cup/bucket is such a basic mistake with such obvious drawbacks, it's rarely even discussed as an issue. Does anyone else see this as a problem? Media types of this sort are being created to solve a problem, though. I believe they may indicate an unsatisfied need to specify not only syntactic type, but also semantic type in a uniform way. Which would present the more uniform interface? - Each implementer creating custom headers & custom registries for these data types - Header & registry defined by a fantastic standards body :-) At any rate, thanks for all your hard work & genius. Apologies if this isn't the proper forum/format/approach/timing/anythingelse. Regards, Ray
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 08:59:38 UTC