- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:12:06 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 4/01/2012 3:43 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> "Almost", because it doesn't use Base.fragment when R.frament is
> undefined.
>
> a) Should we try describe the algorithm based on RFC 3986 ("do
> relative resolution as defined by ..., then, if the result doesn't
> have a fragment, add the one from the Base URI")?
+1 on this.
>
> b) Is this potentially an erratum for RFC 3986?
>
um.
AYJ
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 05:13:10 UTC