- From: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:22:52 -0500
- To: Jonathan Billington <Jonathan.Billington@unisa.edu.au>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Sonya Arnold <sonya.arnold@unisa.edu.au>
On 12/19/2011 09:22 PM, Jonathan Billington wrote: > 1. Section 6.1.1 Purpose So I've also been reviewing the -17 specs, and was going to suggest that 6.1.1 is no longer relevant (except for the "SHOULD implement" part at the end) and should just be removed. Everyone agrees that persistent connections are a good thing now; we don't need to spend a whole page citing 15-year-old research to convince the reader. -- Dan
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 15:23:30 UTC