- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:14:27 +0100
- To: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2011-12-14 17:02, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote: > Hi Mark et al, > > On 14/12/2011, at 4:47 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> Do we have agreement that a 3xx + Location can / should trigger an automatic redirect (taking into account user notification -- a separate issue)? >> > > If i may provide some observations wrt browser clients and the tests performed to determine the current state of interpretation of http spec and resulting implementation of response handling. > > The most interesting aspect for me was the difference between content vs no-content responses. This is the area of greatest complementary implementation behaviour across vendors, and for good reason. > > The behaviour of a client in response to redirection codes should not be specified in http as this is dependant on the type of client and its role and responsibly for the end user. > > In the case of a browser, the end user is the decision maker and overarching authority over the request and response. for this reason, i believe current behaviour exhibited by *all* implementations is the natural, and correct, behaviour - if content is supplied in response body, terminate any further processing and render the content for the end user to make a decision. Wait a minute. I thought UAs follow 301/302/307 even when sent with content? Also, XHR follows all of these automatically (and no, it should not). > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 16:15:15 UTC