W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: issue 325: When are Location's semantics triggered?, was: Protocols/APIs and redirects

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:14:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4EE8CB63.70507@gmx.de>
To: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2011-12-14 17:02, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote:
> Hi Mark et al,
> On 14/12/2011, at 4:47 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Do we have agreement that a 3xx + Location can / should trigger an automatic redirect (taking into account user notification -- a separate issue)?
> If i may provide some observations wrt browser clients and the tests performed to determine the current state of interpretation of http spec and resulting implementation of response handling.
> The most interesting aspect for me was the difference between content vs no-content responses. This is the area of greatest complementary implementation behaviour across vendors, and for good reason.
> The behaviour of a client in response to redirection codes should not be specified in http as this is dependant on the type of client and its role and responsibly for the end user.
> In the case of a browser, the end user is the decision maker and overarching authority over the request and response. for this reason, i believe current behaviour exhibited by *all* implementations is the natural, and correct, behaviour - if content is supplied in response body, terminate any further processing and render the content for the end user to make a decision.

Wait a minute.

I thought UAs follow 301/302/307 even when sent with content?

Also, XHR follows all of these automatically (and no, it should not).

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 16:15:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:54 UTC