Re: Prefer Draft Feedback

On 2011-12-12 22:15, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-12-08 18:56, James Snell wrote:
>> Ok, a new draft has been published.
> ...

    A preference token MAY specify a value.  Empty, or zero length values
    on both the preference token and within parameters are equivalent to
    no value being specified at all.  The following, then, are

      Prefer: foo; bar=""
      Prefer: foo=; bar
      Prefer: foo=""; bar=

In the above examples, the second and the third one are invalid (missing 
value after "="). Bad examples, or bug in the ABNF? (I'd prefer the former).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 13:10:40 UTC