- From: Dale Anderson <dra@redevised.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:19:12 -0800
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 08:19:41 UTC
That most definitely did not occur to us dude Actually I just had to make a Big Lebowski reference on httpbis to save my life. I will say that my intuition is that the 407 would come bearing some response header indicative of what the client was supposed to make for a next attempt, that would suffice at least for implementations I am imagining? Dale 2011/12/8 Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> > > Hi all > > hopefully a quick question... > > what is the best response code for a proxy that receives a request with a > Proxy-Authorization header that specifies a method that is not acceptable > to the proxy? > > another 407? > 403? We don't want the client to repeat the request as is... > > or do we need a new status code for "auth method not allowed". > > Regards > > Adrien de Croy > > -- > Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com > WinGate 7 is released! - http://www.wingate.com/**getlatest/<http://www.wingate.com/getlatest/> > > >
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 08:19:41 UTC