- From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:03:52 +1300
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
that was my initial though too, but in this case we'd already sent a 407 with advertised methods, so the client already got it wrong once... Regards Adrien On 9/12/2011 3:02 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think that'd be a 407; this basically says "here is the list of accepted auth methods" and the client can put two and two together... > > Cheers, > > > On 09/12/2011, at 12:57 PM, Adrien de Croy wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> hopefully a quick question... >> >> what is the best response code for a proxy that receives a request with a Proxy-Authorization header that specifies a method that is not acceptable to the proxy? >> >> another 407? >> 403? We don't want the client to repeat the request as is... >> >> or do we need a new status code for "auth method not allowed". >> >> Regards >> >> Adrien de Croy >> >> -- >> Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com >> WinGate 7 is released! - http://www.wingate.com/getlatest/ >> >> > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > -- Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com WinGate 7 is released! - http://www.wingate.com/getlatest/
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 02:04:16 UTC