- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:43:04 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Right. So, back to the questions above -- what is a HTTP proxy supposed to do in these situations? Should this specific requirement be relaxed? Yes, that's what I said earlier -- it is a bug to say that the field-value MUST be sent in a specific form when senders are not expected to rewrite the field-value, and might actually be forbidden from doing so by other requirements. What it is supposed to say is that newly generated Date field-values MUST be of the standard form. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:43:28 UTC