On 12/5/11 7:32 PM, "James Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-http-prefer-05 Hi James, I had a question about the following recommendation: > When honoring the "return-status" preference, the server SHOULD NOT > include a Content-Location header field in the response. What if the status has its own URI, to be used for polling the status of a long-running job, for example? Wouldn't it be appropriate to provide this URI in a Content-Location header on the response? Jon ........ Jon Moore Comcast Interactive MediaReceived on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 16:38:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:26 UTC