- From: Moore, Jonathan (CIM) <Jonathan_Moore@Comcast.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:38:17 +0000
- To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12/5/11 7:32 PM, "James Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-http-prefer-05 Hi James, I had a question about the following recommendation: > When honoring the "return-status" preference, the server SHOULD NOT > include a Content-Location header field in the response. What if the status has its own URI, to be used for polling the status of a long-running job, for example? Wouldn't it be appropriate to provide this URI in a Content-Location header on the response? Jon ........ Jon Moore Comcast Interactive Media
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 16:38:58 UTC